Week 9: Not What You Want, But What You Need

Aryan R -

Introduction

Dear readers,

Here is the blog post you have all been waiting for fervently! In this upcoming blog, after overcoming the arduous trial that is VCA for Sm3Ru4Sn11Ge2, I have finally produced the band structure for it.

Yippee!!! I know that this isn’t the most riveting of graphs, but the information that can be gleaned from it is really crucial in understanding the future potential of the material. Here is a quick excerpt from week 6 explaining the graph for Sm3Ru4Sn13,which can be applied here.
“The band structures show no visible band gaps-which are empty spaces where the “spaghetti” don’t cross each other at all-emulating metallic behavior. Although good thermoelectrics exhibit properties similar to metals, they have pronounced band gaps. Overall, this graph doesn’t seem to be as promising as I had hoped in indicating that this materials would be a good thermoelectric, as it suggests that it would be pretty average amongst most materials in thermal and electrical conductivity.”

The Really Really Technical Explanation

Notably, the Sm3Ru4Sn13 graph is less crowded than the one above, suggesting it is a better TE material than Sm3Ru4Sn11Ge2, although both are not likely thermoelectric materials. However, what the above graph suggests is that this material is potentially a good material to explore complex quantum behavior such as non-conventional superconductivity. The f-bands from the Ru seem to be heavily overlapping with the others (the crowding of the spaghetti you see above), and if they overlap with the conduction band then they could participate in hybridization with itinerant electrons, leading to strong electronic correlations.

This type of hybridization is a hallmark of heavy fermion systems, where localized f-electron states interact with conduction electrons, giving rise to emergent phenomena such as unconventional superconductivity, quantum criticality, or non-Fermi liquid behavior.In particular, if the f-bands lie near or cross the Fermi level, even partially, they can mediate Cooper pairing mechanisms that deviate from the classical BCS theory-enabling, for instance, d-wave or even more exotic pairing symmetries. The structural complexity of the skutterudite lattice further enhances this possibility by introducing subtle symmetry-breaking distortions that can lift degeneracies and tune band interactions.

Next Week!

Since this alloy seems more promising in terms of quantum behavior, the pdos analysis next week will also focus on those aspects to determine where these materials can best be implemented. I hope to see you all excited for next week! Thank you so much for reading!

More Posts

Comments:

All viewpoints are welcome but profane, threatening, disrespectful, or harassing comments will not be tolerated and are subject to moderation up to, and including, full deletion.

    sai_g
    This is really fascinating! Could you explain a bit more how you plan to identify or confirm non-conventional superconductivity or quantum criticality from your current data? Also, are there specific experimental results you expect to see that would validate your predictions?
    aryan_r
    Actually confirming non-conventional superconductivity or quantum criticality is outside the scope of the research that I am currently doing. This research aims to characterize the materials so future research further looking into them can further investigate and confirm phenomena like non-conventional superconductivity or quantum criticality. As mentioned above, I came to this conclusion because of the potentially heavily correlated f-bands that create the optimal conditions for unconventional superconductivity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *