Excel-lent Cataloging!

Katherine v -

Hello, Readers!

This week at PAM, I learned how to digitally catalog items from the archives. The archives keeps track and preserves a variety of different items, including things like documents and newspapers that I worked with for the gallery as well as artifacts such as pins and t-shirts that I got to work with this week. It was really cool to see how each item was stored and labeled, and I even got to learn the history behind some of the items. For example, there was a box full of pins made to promote a campaign for the museum’s building expansion in 1993-1996. 

A picture I took for the catalog. The building expansion pins and their box are shown

Since the cataloging was digital, I had to take pictures of each item. I expected it to be hard and for the pictures to be bad because I still only had my phone to work with, but it ended up being way better than before. This is mainly due to the fact that I had control over environmental factors such as the color of the background and the angle of the lighting because I was not limited to taking pictures of an item already mounted on the wall. I regret not doing the same for the items in the gallery, but it is already finished. 

The background for my catalog photos
A picture I took for the catalog. Five different button pins are shown
A picture I took for the catalog. A metal frog is shown

After the pictures, I input information about the item into – you guessed it – a spreadsheet. Since I already worked a lot with spreadsheets previously, I felt more comfortable using them, making my task less grueling than doing the condition reports. I resolved my dislike with Google Sheets and Microsoft Excel, even if they still frustrate me at times.

But, I did not only work with spreadsheets; I had the opportunity to learn how to use a different program for digital cataloging. My mentor taught me how to use a program called Omeka, where the information can be gathered in a website-like manner. It takes the metadata we write into the program and organizes it in a way where it can easily be accessed in a list. Unfortunately, I cannot show the progress on Omeka yet, but instead, I have added a photograph of the packet of vocabulary terms that I could reference if I was confused on anything related to digital cataloging. 

The front of the packet of vocabulary. It is 49 pages long.

The front of the page says “Dublin Core” because that is the name of the method of organizing the metadata for archival objects. This means Omeka will ask for input such as “creator”, “subject”, and “description.” The other option is VRA Core, which is used for objects relating to fine art. It asks for input for fields like “artist/maker”, “collection”, and “cultural context.”

A printed version of the Dublin Core metadata fields.

In addition to my work with Omeka, I got to see the way the museum catalogs their objects. It is different from the way my mentor is doing it, as the program is Piction Discoverer rather than Omeka. But, a lot of the information inputted is the same, such as a description and the format and medium of the object. I had a lot of fun browsing part of the museum’s collection, and I would have loved to see the metadata of every single object if I had the time. 

I did a lot of detailed descriptions for the cataloging, so I decided to make my poem short and simple:

Spreadsheets –

Since I now Excel at using them

I have a better Outlook on life,

Painful times thrown out the Windows

 

The last thing I did this week was something different: making boxes for slides. The slides are little pictures framed with a sturdy, cardstock-like material that can be placed in front of a light to show the photograph. The archives has a large collection of them, but some of them were stored in plastic sheets unsuitable for the slides. Others were in polypropylene sheets, which was okay since the sheets were approved for archival use; however, we needed to move the ones in the normal plastic sheet to prevent degradation. My mentor taught me how to make little storage boxes out of old folders, both recycling the material while also creating a way to organize the slides. I made 13 boxes this week while another volunteer sorted the slides and labeled them. 

The binder full of slides.
The example slide box I was given
The example slide box when unfolded
Recycled, old folder I used for the new boxes
The folder after I traced the outlines of the boxes

Next week, I will continue the digital catalog and perhaps make some more slide boxes if we need them. 

More Posts

Comments:

All viewpoints are welcome but profane, threatening, disrespectful, or harassing comments will not be tolerated and are subject to moderation up to, and including, full deletion.

    allison_h
    Hi Kathy! The pictures you took for the catalog are amazing. When I first saw them, I thought they were professional photos taken from Google. What kind of pictures were on the slides? Were they pictures of items from the museum?
    katherine_v
    Hello, Allison! Thank you for your compliment! My mentor said the same thing about my photos, and I am pretty pleased with the outcome myself. On the slides, the pictures that I saw were photographs of exhibitions. They captured what each part of the exhibit looked like, and they were labeled with the name of the exhibit as well as the time frame that it was on display for.
    nick_a
    Hello Kathy! I found the puns in your poem very funny, and I also really like the pictures you were able to take. The button used to promote a campaign for the museum’s building expansion I think is my favorite, but the metal frog is a close second. Did you create the background for the catalog photos you took this time around, or was the background a tool you couldn't use before (since the pieces were already displayed) and just decided to use this time?
    danielle_l
    Howdy, Kathy! I can't believe you took those photos with your phone; they look professional to me! I love the puns in your poem and title, and I'm glad to hear working with spreadsheets has gotten easier for you. Making those boxes looks like fun too! Why are you and your mentor using two different programs for the cataloguing? I can't wait to see what behind-the-scenes information we'll learn next!
    cason_t
    Hey Kathy, the pictures you took are absolutely amazing! It's also great to hear that you're feeling more confident with spreadsheets. I'm curious—how long was the packet of vocabulary terms you used, and how often did you find yourself referencing it? I also liked the references in your poem!
    katherine_v
    Hello, Nick! Thank you for your compliment! I tried to add as many puns as I could, so I am glad you liked them. In regards to your question, the background was a tool I could only use this time since the gallery items were already mounted and we could not take them down to take the catalog photos. I had to make peace with that situation, but the catalog items can be moved around freely so I did not have the same problem with the lighting and background.
    katherine_v
    Hello, Danielle! I have a small correction to make: my mentor and I are actually using the same program for the catalog. It is the Phoenix Art Museum itself that uses a different program called Piction; however, it is outdated and runs super slowly. My mentor is using Omeka because it is newer and runs better. That being said, I have no idea if the museum plans on moving the information on Piction to a different program.
    katherine_v
    Hello, Cason! The packet of vocabulary terms is 49 pages long! Surprisingly, I do not use it often; I did not have time to read through the entirety of its contents, so I only flip through it if I encounter something specific I do not understand. But, my mentor did a very good job of guiding me through everything, so I did not have too much trouble.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *