Slight Challenge

Saanvi Y -

When I first planned my methodology, I never expected there to be any issue on measuring participation. I assumed there would be some vague behaviours, but I planned for that situation to be handled by simply writing down the behaviour and later consulting with the teacher. However, I still need to be able to assign a participation description to a student for that to work. I would need students to stay in their seat the entire class to ensure I can measure their participation. Yet, what if students weren’t in their spots? What if they never stayed in one spot, let alone their designated spot?
I encountered this the first time on week 4 of my observation. It was lab day, and Neon had to actually stand up and form groups of 6 to work on their waves lab. 6 was a particularly difficult number to deal with since the seats were arranged in 2’s and 4’s. Getting clean 6’s was difficult for the class. There was an uneven splicing, where 1 group had 6 people, 1 group had 7, and 2 groups had 8. When they got up and mingled with each other, I quickly realised that depending on their seat to categorize behaviour would fail me. They weren’t in seats. 

Luckily, I had committed faces to memory subconsciously. I was able to recognise students as students 1, A, 7, E, or whatever symbol they were given. I focused on students and measured their participation as normal. I stood in the back, dead centre, getting a clear view of every group. Once all their work was done, and they sat down at their assigned seats, I cross checked my own measurements with their seats. I was pleasantly surprised that I had made no error in labeling students as certain seats. 

While I may not encounter this again as there are only 2 more days of observation and no labs are planned, I do believe that if any future senior is to require observation for their project and need to observe students relative to their seating chart, I would support committing faces and symbols to memory prior to observation. In fact, the safest option might be collecting consent forms on recording classes. While it may be a hassle for getting consent, it provides the most precise way to follow students and categorise behaviour without fear of human error. 



More Posts

Comments:

All viewpoints are welcome but profane, threatening, disrespectful, or harassing comments will not be tolerated and are subject to moderation up to, and including, full deletion.

    jasper_l
    Your research is trying to see how designated seating charts affect student behavior. Can you use the data from the lab given the fact that the data don't follow the seating pattern?
    saanvi_y
    This is a great question! Since they aren't technically in their seats, it isn't really data from their "seat" that I am collecting. Their lab groups were created based on their seat locations, so they interacted with the same people they would naturally based on their seating arrangement, leading to almost all lab groups being 50% male and 50% female. It was still gender integrated to a degree, just with less order. Using the lab helps me understand if their communication and group participation also exist at high levels of participation in GIR despite the increased freedom to talk and be distracted.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *