Asking The Right Questions
Vinesh k -
This week, I took a closer look at Mona Rafat’s thesis, zeroing in on a key piece of the puzzle: how much water each sorbent actually releases. Understanding this is critical because this directly affects the efficiency of a material. These numbers will directly shape my cost analysis, helping determine whether atmospheric water capture can be both effective and affordable in the long run.
To make sure my analysis is as accurate as possible, I reached out to my professor and research group with two important questions:
- What exact type of sorbent was used? There are many variations of these materials, and each one performs differently. If I use the wrong data, my entire cost model could be off. Getting the specifics will ensure that my calculations match real-world conditions.
- Does water capture increase in a straight line as we add more material? In other words, if I double the amount of sorbent, will I get twice as much water? It sounds like a simple question, but in reality, the relationship isn’t always that straightforward. Some materials reach a saturation point, meaning adding more won’t necessarily give a proportional increase in water capture. This is a crucial detail for predicting long-term efficiency and costs.
By answering these questions, I can refine my equation and make it more realistic. The more precise the model, the better I can assess whether these systems can scale up to provide water in a cost-effective way. Every step in this process brings me closer to answering the big question: Can atmospheric water capture be a practical solution for real-world use?
I’ll be updating my equation with these new insights and testing different scenarios in the coming weeks. Stay tuned as I continue to break down the numbers and move one step closer to uncovering the true potential of this technology!
Comments:
All viewpoints are welcome but profane, threatening, disrespectful, or harassing comments will not be tolerated and are subject to moderation up to, and including, full deletion.